Health Policy | USP
 About Us Contact Us Receive Updates
   
  Special Topics
   Health Law and Regulation  
   Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit  
   Senior Health  
   Intersection of Mental Health Services and Other Community Systems  
   Economic Analysis  
     
     Scholars @ USP
   
     Events @ USP
   
     Publications
   
     News & Highlights
   
     Resource Links
   
     Community Connections
 
     
   
 
M.S. & Ph.D.
Health Policy Programs
 
     
   
 
Learn about the new Health Policy Institute.
 
Health Policy
 

Home > News & Highlights

 
     
 
Summary of Remarks
Lynn Oppenheim, Ph.D., President and CEO
Barton Parrott, M.B.A., Senior Manager
Center for Applied Research (CFAR)
October 11, 2006
 

As health care in general and pharmaceutical organizations in particular become more complex, the paradigm for making decisions within these organizations must also, from necessity, become more complex.   Traditional hierarchical decision making structures have the advantage of clarity but lack the ability to spread risk and to pull in ideas from throughout the organization.  Matrix decision structures – where each person might report to several stakeholders as in drug development teams – have become more the norm in pharmaceutical companies. Yet within matrix structures there exists the possibility that the decision making process has become confused – individuals are unsure of who has the final approval for a decision, who is ultimately responsible and who needs to be consulted.

 

The Center for Applied Research (CFAR), a Philadelphia based consulting firm, recently conducted a large-scale survey inside a major pharmaceutical company to determine the clarity and efficiency of its matrix decision making structure. The survey found that for major projects there was considerable confusion as to who had the power to approve certain decisions and, in some instances, no one could be identified as having the ultimate responsibility. It found that some executives’ understanding of their actual role was not clearly understood either by themselves or by other members of the organization. 

 

Because of the interdisciplinary and inter-cultural nature of the health care industry, especially as it is likely to evolve in the 21st century, matrix structures will become more of a necessity. A variety of opinions and viewpoints will need to be heard, a variety of different cultural understandings will need to be taken into consideration, and collaboration will become the foundation for all decisions. However, without clear reporting and approval structures in place, matrix systems will not be able to capitalize on these dynamics. Effective implementation of matrix systems will affect the development of drugs, the actualization of health policy on both large and small scales, and the operation of hospitals.  In other words, the future of health care.

 
Bruce Rosenthal, MBA
Ph.D. Health Policy Program
 
 
  Search
 
 
 
 
Spotlight On...
  Community Connections

LENDING A HAND TO THE UNINSURED

USP Health Policy doctoral student is key to effort to establish a pro bono clinic in Southwest Philadelphia helping patients who are unable to afford rehab care.

 
     
   
   
 
 
 
  600 S. 43rd Street • Philadelphia, PA 19104-4495 • Phone: 215.596.8800
©2004 University of the Sciences in Philadelphia | All rights reserved | Privacy Policy